I can not speak to your experience Steve that you have shared, nor do I know of what mitigating events could have contributed to the durability you suggested to have observed? It could be the soil type, biome specifics, aired climate, or other extenuating context, roof overhang coverage or the related details of the project...???...:|...or just not in the ground long enough?
What I can speak to on this matter, is hundreds of cases of decay I have personally observed, repaired and/or had to intervene on when the erroneous practice takes place. Wood embedded/encapsulated in OPC and related concrete materials...is a decay issue.
In some association and related building/architectural groups (and I've been told local code for some areas now) for "domestic architecture" embedment of...structural posts...in concrete for Pole Barns...Beach houses, and related "pole architecture," ...embedment of PT wood, Rot Resistant species, Telephone Poles, etc..
.is not allowed... because of the issues with wood rapidly decaying when encapsulated in concrete...Nor is structurally necessary or add any strength to a buildings "moment connection" strength or "uplift resistance"...
Whether
"pile driven wood post" or "
poteaux-en-terremodalities"...the majority is done (virtually all?)...without...concrete of any sort, and the only contemporary...
decay issues...that have occurred with the historic vernacular systems of "post in ground" foundation systems occurred after the inappropriate embedment in concrete, and/or the improper wood species selection and application modalities...
Proper depth, back fill with gravel and/or stone, and a in soils with poor "load capacity" a footer stone...is al that is needed for a secure setting of such posts...