My only thought is that sucks man. How hard did the saw fall.....
that is correct, you need to read 240 volts from leg to leg.I just conferred with a knowledgeable electrical person and he suggested QUOTE: 119v on each leg doesn't necessarily mean 240v. He needs to see 240v on his meter. Sounds like one leg tripped a breaker or blew a fuse.
Depends where he got the voltage readings. Did he get them out of the wall outlet, before the switch or at the motor? I don't have a clue where he got the readings. I can't rule out the capacitor but I would not even consider it with the info he has given. Need more info.Steve Neul said:It's reasonable to me to have 119V on each leg. Voltage will vary from house to house. I've gotten anywhere from 110V on a leg to 129V. If there is 238V going to the motor it should run. It has to be the capacitors, internal start switch or the windings.
In his initial post he tried the saw as originally wired and when that didn't work bypassed the switch and wired the motor directly to the power source with the same results.Depends where he got the voltage readings. Did he get them out of the wall outlet, before the switch or at the motor? I don't have a clue where he got the readings. I can't rule out the capacitor but I would not even consider it with the info he has given. Need more info.
Tom
That the reason I asked in a previous post to show a wiring diagram of how he wired directly to the motor. He sounded like he was unsure of what he was doing and just wanted to make sure it looked like he did bypass switch correctly. Not really disagreeing with what you said other than I would not rule out a lose wire bad switch etc.Steve Neul said:In his initial post he tried the saw as originally wired and when that didn't work bypassed the switch and wired the motor directly to the power source with the same results.
I see your point. Perhaps he missed the ground.That the reason I asked in a previous post to show a wiring diagram of how he wired directly to the motor. He sounded like he was unsure of what he was doing and just wanted to make sure it looked like he did bypass switch correctly. Not really disagreeing with what you said other than I would not rule out a lose wire bad switch etc.
Tom
Thanks for letting us know the problem. We have a lot of cases where a new person posts a problem like this and never comes back to let's us know the real problem was after several people have provided advice. I total understand your problem now. Also, welcome aboard.Swiftowl said:First, thank you all for your prompt and helpful responses. It's nice to know there are folks out there who will help when help is needed. Turns out the problem was the power source. 120v on each leg does not necessarily mean 240v. A great lesson for me. I used a 2 pole breaker that only drew off of one bus bar contact rather than a 2 pole breaker that draws off of two contacts on the bus bar. Okay, I'm an idiot and admit it. At least I figured it out before I spent a lot of money to have someone else tell me I'm an idiot. Anyway, saw is purring. Thanks again to all who chimed in.
Yea that would do it. Alternating current runs from + to - and without the other line the power would be just turning on and off. It needs the opposite line for the neutral.First, thank you all for your prompt and helpful responses. It's nice to know there are folks out there who will help when help is needed. Turns out the problem was the power source. 120v on each leg does not necessarily mean 240v. A great lesson for me. I used a 2 pole breaker that only drew off of one bus bar contact rather than a 2 pole breaker that draws off of two contacts on the bus bar. Okay, I'm an idiot and admit it. At least I figured it out before I spent a lot of money to have someone else tell me I'm an idiot. Anyway, saw is purring. Thanks again to all who chimed in.