Wide belt sander specifications? - Woodworking Talk - Woodworkers Forum
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 6 Old 06-06-2015, 10:32 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 35
View Tom_in_PA's Photo Album My Photos
Wide belt sander specifications?

I am looking at getting a small wide belt sander to clean up thin stock after resawing. I am looking at the 12" Grizzly G0459 model. The specifications on this (and most others I have looked at) say the minimum thickness is 1/8". I need to clean up boards that are 1/16". Will this model still work or any other machines you have used to accomplish this? What would happen if I sanded boards that thin? I know a thickness planer would never work but I am thinking very light passes in these sanders would be ok still.

http://www.grizzly.com/products/12-B...Series-/G0459P
Tom_in_PA is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 Old 06-06-2015, 10:42 PM
where's my table saw?
 
woodnthings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SE, Michigan
Posts: 25,838
View woodnthings's Photo Album My Photos
you are confusing two different sanders

I have the Polar Bear Baby Grizzly drum sander you linked. It is not a wide belt sander.

Now that we have that cleared up... will it work for sanding thinner material down to 1/16" ...I donno?

Luthiers use drum sanders for thin material and I know one who does personally. He made his own and here's one that is similar:

http://www.boydguitarworks.com/Thickness.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TekhIAwHB3M

The answer to your question will only be as detailed and specific as the question is detailed and specific. Good questions also include a sketch or a photo that illustrates your issue. (:< D)

Last edited by woodnthings; 06-06-2015 at 10:48 PM.
woodnthings is online now  
post #3 of 6 Old 06-07-2015, 02:28 AM
Village Idiot
 
epicfail48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 4,682
View epicfail48's Photo Album My Photos
Being that a sander is much less aggressive than say, a planer, there should be less risk of a thinner workpiece being sucked into the head. That said, I'd be willing to wager that with an auxillary bed of sorts you shouldn't have any issues going thinner that 1/8. My guess is that the 1/8 thickness limit is because that's as low as the drum/ high as the table can move without bumping into the frame

I need cheaper hobby
etsy.com/shop/projectepicfail
epicfail48 is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to epicfail48 For This Useful Post:
OnealWoodworking (08-23-2015)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 6 Old 06-07-2015, 11:52 AM
Senior Member
 
hwebb99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,881
View hwebb99's Photo Album My Photos
My jet sander will go all they down to the bed, but it sat unused for a few years and has a crease in the conveyer belt. If you keep the belt held down it works fine, but if you let it run with nothing in it it hits the high spot in the belt.
hwebb99 is offline  
post #5 of 6 Old 06-07-2015, 11:54 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 35
View Tom_in_PA's Photo Album My Photos
Thanks for the clarification woodnthings.

I did a little more research and was able to find this same question asked elsewhere. There were a number of solutions provided but the best sounds like adhering a piece of sandpaper on a board and using it as a sled. The sandpaper adds enough friction to hold the thin stock while allowing the "drum sander" to remove milling marks. All have said though be sure you take light passes!
Tom_in_PA is offline  
post #6 of 6 Old 08-22-2015, 10:41 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 35
View Tom_in_PA's Photo Album My Photos
Well I finally got this sander today as I found it on craigslist. The sander is practically brand new as it had less than an hour of use on it. Sadly the family is selling off their father's equipment as he passed away. This was the last piece of equipment he bought before getting sick. They were glad to see it go to someone who wanted it and would use it. They sold it to me for $325 and even included 2 full rolls of sandpaper, spare roller chain, spare PC controller board, and a homemade stand on casters!

For those interested I ran a test and was able to take a piece of scrap 2" wide ash from 3/32" to 1/16" (slightly under actually as the calipers read .060) with no problems. Before trying it I raised the bed while the machine was turned off and there appeared to be space still between the bed and the drum when set at 1/16". When running the test I slowly raised the bed only a 1/4 turn at a time to be sure not to damage the belt. Each pass was successful and there was still space between the drum and belt when finished.

Last edited by Tom_in_PA; 08-22-2015 at 11:30 PM.
Tom_in_PA is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Woodworking Talk - Woodworkers Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trying to locate a wide belt sander Pat Fitzpatrick Power Tools & Machinery 5 04-16-2014 01:06 PM
Drum Sander verses Wide Belt Sander TomC Power Tools & Machinery 21 04-11-2014 07:52 PM
wide belt or drum sander ? bob sacamano Power Tools & Machinery 7 07-24-2012 09:14 AM
24 inch wide belt sander nywoodwork Power Tools & Machinery 5 11-17-2010 10:05 AM
Grizzly wide belt sander ??'s nwksremodeler Power Tools & Machinery 3 01-03-2010 11:05 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome